<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IdahoLiberty.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idaholiberty.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idaholiberty.com</link>
	<description>If you don't work for liberty, you don't get it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:24:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>homegrown surgery</title>
		<link>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=264</link>
		<comments>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=264#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idaholiberty.com/?p=264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got really cornered into doing some surgery on a chicken foot. Okay, I&#8217;m a sissy in this particular area and put it off longer than I would have had I been raised killing and cutting up things for meat rather than buying it in nifty packages from the meat market. I went to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got really cornered into doing some surgery on a chicken foot.  Okay, I&#8217;m a sissy in this particular area and put it off longer than I would have had I been raised killing and cutting up things for meat rather than buying it in nifty packages from the meat market.<br />
<span id="more-264"></span><br />
I went to the livestock supply house and bought some antibiotic for the chicken water supply (or pigs or cows that I don&#8217;t have).  I bought some betadine for post-surgery soak on the foot.  I bought toenail clippers and quality tweezers pointed and slant-tip. I came home all psyched up to finally cut that string off the chicken&#8217;s foot that had been bleeding for over a week and plaguing that poor leghorn.</p>
<p>Those of you comfortably with the hands-on details of animal husbandry will wonder at the delay. Those raised in the city with everything the purvey of experts and specialists will understand.</p>
<p>So my major preparation today may seem that I bought betadine, water soluable antibiotics, extra-strength Orajel (for potential future use as a topical anesthetic on dogs and people), clippers and GOOD tweezers.  But the real big deal is I got off my &#8220;can&#8217;t do that&#8221; squeamishness and made myself go out to the chicken coop after dark when I could actually capture an extremely quick, skittish leghorn and put her under the knife in my hands.</p>
<p>Then I find that nature took care of it late today.  The toe with the tourniquet on it fell off before I could fix it or amputate.  Cool beans.  Win win.  Or did I really get over any hump at all?</p>
<p>Regardless, a nice side-effect is that we have more good, perhaps crucial stuff in our first-aid supply kit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://idaholiberty.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=264</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>jobs programs</title>
		<link>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=348</link>
		<comments>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=348#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idaholiberty.com/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Job creation, government style, is a splashy, photo-op filled, nice-sounding program that makes politicians sound clever and seem proactive. The Boise Valley Economic Partnership is a taxpayer and private money example of the process. They are now four years into this five-year, $5,000,000 government program. The planned $650,000,000 private/taxpayer investment has fallen short of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="shutterset_" href='http://idaholiberty.com/wp-content/gallery/pictures/ribbon-cutting.jpg' title=''><img src='http://idaholiberty.com/wp-content/gallery/pictures/thumbs/thumbs_ribbon-cutting.jpg' alt='ribbon-cutting' class='ngg-singlepic ngg-left' /></a>Job creation, government style, is a splashy, photo-op filled, nice-sounding program that makes politicians sound clever and seem proactive.  The <a href="http://www.idahostatesman.com/2010/06/13/1229040/boise-job-creation-program-retooling.html">Boise Valley Economic Partnership</a> is a taxpayer and private money example of the process. They are now four years into this five-year, $5,000,000 government program. </p>
<p>The planned $650,000,000 private/taxpayer investment has fallen short of the goal, but only by $530,000,000.  The planned 5,000 new jobs has fallen short by 3,194 jobs. But the Boise area did get 1,806 new jobs (&#8230; while losing 10,000 &#8211; oops).  Those new jobs only cost $66,445 each!<br />
<span id="more-348"></span><br />
With official unemployment reported to be 10% and actual unemployment at 22% (<a href="http://www.shadowstats.com/">see shadowstats.com</a>) &#8211; and rising, it sure looks like a real good time for the Idaho state government to deliberately, with great fanfare, publicity and ribbon-cutting ceremonies, attempt to create poverty and joblessness. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, 17 million small businesses in the USA constitute 99.7% of employers, employ 52% of the private workforce and account for 40% of the GDP.  In &#8217;94-&#8217;98, small business-dominated industries provided 11.1 million new jobs; virtually ALL of the new jobs created during that time period.  Small businesses are most likely to generate jobs for youth, older workers and women, provide 67% of first jobs and produce 55% of the US innovations.</p>
<p>Instead of helping and encouraging small businesses, however, government assaults them, restricts them, competes with them and prevents them. Bureaus, boards and officials appointed or elected require licensing, paperwork, compliance, audit, testing and dictate many practices that stifle innovation and often prevent success. While jumping through government hoops is a small part of a big business, it is a big part of small business.</p>
<p>Programs that demonstrably do create jobs are private micro loans. Though distinctly un-splashy, these are proving to be the best way to lift economies out of poverty and unemployment.</p>
<p>A micro-loan is as little as a few hundred dollars invested into a one-person business with minimal qualifications. That tiny borrowed amount can launch a vegetable stand, repair shop, or bicycle taxi &#8212; a living in other words. As each micro-loan is repaid (and most are), the effects of that small goodness are amplified and leveraged by being loaned out and invested again and again. </p>
<p>For more on micro-loans, see <a href="http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/001484.php">micro-loans online</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microcredit">Wikipedia</a>, <a href="http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/biz/Capital_borrowing/20001013.asp">Micro-enterprise comes to America</a>, <a href="http://www.accion.org/">accion.org</a> or search the Internet for more &#8211; there&#8217;s a lot of success out there for not much money&#8230; and NO taxpayer dollars at all.</p>
<p>What can/should government and the governor do? Reduce taxes, reduce barriers, eliminate restrictions to entry, eliminate paper-pushers who demand to be fed papers that someone has to create rather than tending to their business.</p>
<p>The best and consistently most successful thing government can do to create jobs and wealth is to <strong>get out of the way</strong>.  Too bad nobody is likely to get a picture of me cutting a ceremonial ribbon to introduce that program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://idaholiberty.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=348</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>mercantilists</title>
		<link>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=343</link>
		<comments>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=343#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law / legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idaholiberty.com/?p=343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mercantilism is where the merchants own the power in government. It protects the merchants from competition and increases the costs to customers of their goods and services. It comes about because a handful of people have a great deal to gain from investment in legislation while society’s individuals have little to gain or lose with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mercantilism is where the merchants own the power in government. It protects the merchants from competition and increases the costs to customers of their goods and services. It comes about because a handful of people have a great deal to gain from investment in legislation while society’s individuals have little to gain or lose with each law. In extreme examples, governments go to war to protect and foster merchants’ interests.<br />
<span id="more-343"></span><br />
The British Empire of the 1700’s and 1800’s is a great example of this. Their expansion around the globe supported markets and sources of raw materials that created an extremely wealthy merchant class with austerity marking the lot of the great masses of the English and world’s population.</p>
<p>Those with much to win can spend lavishly entertaining, electing or even being politicians. Those whose interaction to that specialty is limited cannot even justify a letter or phone call to beg the legislators to not restrict their liberties or increase their cost of living.</p>
<p>The first century of this country was guided by a very limited government. Liberty was great in all areas. The unfettered marketplace fostered innovation and competition the likes of which the world had never seen. The next century saw a steady increase in mercantilism. In the last 50 years, the parasites have become so numerous and successful that the great engine of liberty and prosperity is being brought to its knees. </p>
<p>That few can go through a normal day without breaking some laws is commonly understood. It is sad we accept this, but overwhelming to fight it. Throughout every day we bear the costs of specialized protection for selected groups. It would be frustrating to think about it all, and futile to fight it, so we accept and move on.</p>
<p>It is fortunately unusual that we have to deal with the details of funeral arrangements. Emotions are high and experience is low. But ask yourself now how it came to pass that returning the mortal flesh of the deceased to the earth costs $5,000 and there are no legal alternatives?</p>
<p>Try, as I recently did, to get a scratched, but otherwise perfectly good pair of glasses replaced using a perfectly good four year old prescription. That’s against the law. “You must get a complete eye exam and new prescription every two years”.  This somehow helps us???</p>
<p>Many of us give good haircuts, styling, braids and hair coloring to friends and family. Just don’t you dare advertise or charge for it without your official permission slip and graduation from the school the merchants of haircuts have designed.</p>
<p>Idaho has 66 organized groups who use state money and state policing to protect their interests from competition. We, the taxpayers, are quite literally paying their little groups to restrict our access to their specialties and increase our cost of doing business with them.  </p>
<p>Accountants, Acupuncturists, Architectural Examiners, Asbestos, Athlete Agents, Athletic Trainers, Attorneys, Barbers, Boiler Inspectors, Building Safety, Child Care, Chiropractic Physicians, Contractors &#8230;</p>
<p>I once watched an innovator of a natural, herbal remedy plead with, and lick the boots of the state pharmacy board that they might allow him to share his product with customers wanting it. What! an alternative to the chemicals we dispense?  Permission denied! I am to this day suspicious that it was not us that was protected thereby.</p>
<p>With tightening budgets becoming the norm, it is an excellent time to SELL these boards and their assets to the highest bidder.  Let the geologists, guides, hearing aid fitters, HVAC installers and all the rest finance their own unions, their own lobbying organization and their own certifying agency.  Let the customers decide if their certificates are worth looking for or if uncertified help or those certified by a competing organization offer better value.</p>
<p>The practitioners of those arts can buy the assets from The State of Idaho. They “win” their independence while the state not only gains the proceeds of the sale, but saves on expenses of support. We all win as competition increases quality and decreases costs. Certifying agencies like Underwriter Labs, Consumer Reports and Good Housekeeping will be joined by numerous others competing to win our trust while serving their industries.</p>
<p>It is not hard to find the losers in this transaction. Though it may seem it is all of the protected mercantilists, in reality it is only those who cannot win their market share in open competition &#8211; and they really should move on to something they can do well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://idaholiberty.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=343</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>corrected vision</title>
		<link>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=340</link>
		<comments>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=340#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[drugs / medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law / legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idaholiberty.com/?p=340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometime after 40, the human eye loses much of its ability to focus up close and far away at the same time. My rifle match scores are deteriorating because I can either see the front sight clearly without prescription lenses or the target clearly with my prescription lenses but I can no longer do both [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometime after 40, the human eye loses much of its ability to focus up close and far away at the same time. My rifle match scores are deteriorating because I can either see the front sight clearly without prescription lenses or the target clearly with my prescription lenses but I can no longer do both well enough to plant my bullets around the bull like I used to. Several competitors have suggested I get shooting glasses that are half-way between plain safety glasses and my distance prescription&#8230; or &#8220;half a diopter less&#8221; than that prescription.</p>
<p>After discussing this idea with two local eyeglass sellers, both told me it is against the law to do that &#8230; without first hiring them to re-examine my eyes and write a fresh prescription.<br />
<span id="more-340"></span><br />
I have perfectly good glasses that give me a clear picture of a 600-yard target. My unaided eyes give me a perfectly clear picture of the front sight. I have a document that lays out the specifics of the distance prescription. They can easily and inexpensively build glasses that do exactly what I want. But they won&#8217;t. </p>
<p>It turns out that The State is protecting me from the horrors of wearing glasses based on a highly modified version of a prescription that was written four long years ago. These glasses that I would wear a few hours a month could, in the enlightened opinion of the state legislators and governor, cause irreparable damage to my eyes. If we modified a prescription that was only two years old, my health and well-being would be assured.</p>
<p>Gosh, what a comfort.</p>
<p>Only the most jaded cynic would theorize that this law was written to protect the optometry industry rather than me. </p>
<p>Hmmm. Perhaps I&#8217;ll adopt jade as my birthstone.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the Internet is my friend.  I have decided I won&#8217;t spend my shooting glasses money locally after all. </p>
<p>Mercantilist laws always seem so clever when the merchants dream them up, but they stifle markets and, in the end, destroy them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://idaholiberty.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=340</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>545 people</title>
		<link>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=338</link>
		<comments>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=338#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idaholiberty.com/?p=338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#8217;t say it better myself, so I&#8217;ll let Charlie Reese speak for himself: 545 PEOPLE&#8211;By Charlie Reese Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.. Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits? Have you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I couldn&#8217;t say it better myself, so I&#8217;ll let Charlie Reese speak for himself:</em></p>
<p>545  PEOPLE&#8211;By Charlie Reese</p>
<p>Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them..</p>
<p>Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?</p>
<p>Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?<br />
<span id="more-338"></span><br />
You and I don&#8217;t propose a federal budget.  The president does.</p>
<p>You and I don&#8217;t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.</p>
<p>You and I don&#8217;t write the tax code, Congress does.</p>
<p>You and I don&#8217;t set fiscal policy, Congress does.</p>
<p>You  and I don&#8217;t control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve  Bank does.</p>
<p>One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one  president, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human  beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally,  and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague  this country.</p>
<p>I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress.   In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.</p>
<p>I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority.  They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing.   I don&#8217;t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash.  The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator&#8217;s responsibility to determine how he votes.</p>
<p>Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault.    They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.</p>
<p>What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall.   No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits&#8230;..   The president can only propose a budget.    He cannot force the Congress to accept it.</p>
<p>The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes.   Who is the speaker of the House?     Nancy Pelosi.  She is the leader of the majority party.  She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want.  If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.</p>
<p>It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not replace 545 people who stand convicted &#8212; by present facts &#8212; of incompetence and irresponsibility.   I can&#8217;t think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people.  When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.</p>
<p>If the tax code is unfair, it&#8217;s because they want it unfair.</p>
<p>If the budget is in the red, it&#8217;s because they want it in the red ..</p>
<p>If the Army &#038; Marines are in   IRAQ , it&#8217;s because they want them in IRAQ  </p>
<p>If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it&#8217;s because they want it that way.</p>
<p>There are no insoluble government problems.</p>
<p>Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power.   Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like &#8220;the economy,&#8221; &#8220;inflation,&#8221; or &#8220;politics&#8221; that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.</p>
<p>Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.</p>
<p>They, and they alone, have the power..</p>
<p>They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.</p>
<p>Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees&#8230;</p>
<p>We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!</p>
<p>Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://idaholiberty.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=338</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>sucked into an insurance scam</title>
		<link>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=336</link>
		<comments>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=336#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 16:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idaholiberty.com/?p=336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my insurance companies just sent my annual statement. I can see the thousands of dollars I paid in, and the thousands my employers sent them instead of paying me more for my labors. The pretty little charts show how much I should expect to get paid back, in monthly installments, if I decide [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my insurance companies just sent my annual statement. I can see the thousands of dollars I paid in, and the thousands my employers sent them instead of paying me more for my labors.  The pretty little charts show how much I should expect to get paid back, in monthly installments, if I decide to ask for it a few years from now.</p>
<p>The bad news is that those with even the most crude understanding of accounting have discovered this insurance company is bankrupt. Yep, their liabilities far exceed their income. They spent my money instead of investing it safely to insure repayment as contracted.<br />
<span id="more-336"></span><br />
The obvious answer is to cash in my account while there is still some value. I would be happy to take pennies on the dollar right now. I could easily find places to put it that would prevent every last drop from evaporating into nothing. Food in the pantry, silver in the bank, tools, hardware or almost anything I could do would be more secure than the ashes they hold in my name.</p>
<p>Even more obvious is that I should stop sending them money every payday.  Of course I should also have my employer discontinue their payments in my name, sending them to a more reliable insurance company or directly to me.  Unfortunately, those choices are not available from this particular provider.</p>
<p>The heading on this statement is, &#8220;What Social Security Means To You&#8221;.  All of the wonderful obfuscation that follows can be summarized in one word: THEFT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://idaholiberty.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=336</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The farmer and the financial analyst</title>
		<link>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=327</link>
		<comments>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=327#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 17:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idaholiberty.com/?p=327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The farmer learns to read nature from nature herself. Similarly, his knowledge of economics, society, politics and current events comes from self-directed study that led him to Mises .org, Lew Rockwell .com, The Daily Reckoning .com, The Mental Militia .com, Rational Review Digest .com and an extensive library of economics, history, politics and sociology books. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The farmer learns to read nature from nature herself. Similarly, his knowledge of economics, society, politics and current events comes from self-directed study that led him to <a href="http://mises.org/">Mises .org</a>, <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/">Lew Rockwell .com</a>,  <a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/">The Daily Reckoning .com</a>, <a href="http://www.thementalmilitia.com/">The Mental Militia .com</a>, <a href="http://www.rationalreview.com/news">Rational Review Digest .com </a> and an extensive library of economics, history, politics and sociology books.<br />
<span id="more-327"></span><br />
The farmer notes that The Federal Reserve act of 1913 changed everything. Congress gave control of the U.S. dollar to a dozen bank families who printed 95 dollars for every 5 that the rest of the people earned. </p>
<p>Some of that money went into political campaigns to insure &#8220;the right attitudes&#8221; would populate the legislatures and executive offices. Some of that money bought newspapers, radio and TV stations to insure &#8220;the right attitudes&#8221; were broadcast to the people. Some of that money went to endowments, grants, scholarships and subsidies to insure &#8220;the right attitudes&#8221; were taught in the schools and universities. </p>
<p>When you can create out of thin air 19 of 20 dollars in the system, you can accomplish most amazing things &#8230; for good or for evil.</p>
<p>Among their more clever accomplishments was making Keynesian economics dominate academia and government. This popular theory holds that governments can spend twice what they take in for as long as they want without cost. It obfuscates Federal Reserve destruction of dollar value. While flying in the face of logic, Keynesian&#8217;s ever-changing models create wonderful rainbows with a mist of gobbely-gook that refracts the light of economic reality.</p>
<p>The financial analyst studies at the university, learns the language of approved economics, earns certified entry to white collar work. He learns to trust experts to run the world altruistically, setting aside human greed for power and money that would cheat his family out of their earnings and security.</p>
<p>The farmer sees history littered with collapsed fiat currencies that shocked and destroyed the unprepared who depended on stability in their country&#8217;s predominate medium of exchange. </p>
<p>The financial analyst sees a dollar with a history of stability far in excess of his lifetime &#8211; If you can ignore the depreciation of its value, which is reasonably easy to do with Keynesian wizards cooking the books.</p>
<p>The farmer divides his tiny reserve between his pantry, tools, investments in soil and hyper-inflation-proof silver hard currency.</p>
<p>The financial analyst is confident the world as he knows it will run as it has all his life with continued economic expansion in perpetuity. Sure a little reserve is a good idea: put it safely away in a stock market that always goes up, a housing market that always goes up, a job market that always expands or entrusted to clever, well-educated, honorable people who in turn put it in those places.</p>
<p>While the farmer wishes the financial analyst would put some of his generous income into real, hard money, he fervently prays that the financial collapse happens just before spring planting when the extra hands of the financial analyst&#8217;s family can help put enough food in the ground that they will all make it through the next winter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://idaholiberty.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=327</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview with Doug Casey</title>
		<link>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=325</link>
		<comments>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=325#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 15:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idaholiberty.com/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While quite startling to those who haven&#8217;t spent a great deal of time studying and understanding real (Austrian school) economics, the following quote out of the middle of a Doug Casey interview states the best of two unsettling choices very well. &#8220;&#8230;back to the present global economy: do you think Greece will default? Doug: First, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While quite startling to those who haven&#8217;t spent a great deal of time studying and understanding real (Austrian school) economics, the following quote out of the middle of a Doug Casey interview states the best of two unsettling choices very well. </p>
<p><em>&#8220;&#8230;back to the present global economy: do you think Greece will default?</p>
<p>Doug: First, you shouldn&#8217;t talk about &#8220;Greece&#8221; like that. We&#8217;re talking about the Greek government&#8217;s debt. And my view is that not only will they default, but that they should default. Generations of future Greek taxpayers should not be turned into serfs in order to pay for the excess of today&#8217;s Greek politicians. And the people who lent the Greek government all that money to do stupid things with should be punished for both their lack of foresight and their collusion with corruption. And it would be doubly good if this happened, because it would greatly hamper the ability of the Greek government to borrow money in the future, which would limit how much it could spend on all the disastrously stupid things governments spend money on.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll go further and say that all of these struggling governments, including the U.S. government, should default on their debts and punish the people foolish enough to lend them money. The world would be a better place if governments around the globe were unable to borrow money.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>That tidbit, of course, is not a complete argument, nor is it done justice standing here alone.  Please go read the whole interview on <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/casey/casey49.1.html">this page of LewRockwell.com </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://idaholiberty.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=325</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man the lifeboats</title>
		<link>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=317</link>
		<comments>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=317#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[law / legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idaholiberty.com/?p=317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The great ship of state is steaming full-speed-ahead towards a colossal iceberg. When it goes down, everyone aboard and anyone nearby will get sucked down into an icy totalitarian tomb along with it. Unconstitutional usurpations of liberty and property are getting signed by the president of the USA so fast it is hard to keep [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great ship of state is steaming full-speed-ahead towards a colossal iceberg. When it goes down, everyone aboard and anyone nearby will get sucked down into an icy totalitarian tomb along with it.</p>
<p>Unconstitutional usurpations of liberty and property are getting signed by the president of the USA so fast it is hard to keep track &#8211; and the mainstream media isn’t even trying (mostly because the legislative sponsors also own the media, but that’s another story altogether). </p>
<p>Just about the time I think I need to strap on my life jacket and swim away from impending doom, I find more people than I imagined launching lifeboats.  This is wonderful news. I am thrilled to share bits of it with you.<br />
<span id="more-317"></span><br />
The <a href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/">Tenth Amendment Center </a> takes its name from that part of The Bill of Rights that says, &#8220;The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or the people.&#8221;  </p>
<p>This is one exciting place that I cannot recommend highly enough. There IS a lot going on. People ARE using the law of the land to defend liberties whose protection was written into the Constitution 230 years ago. </p>
<p>From there you can find articles and links to other activities and actions that say there are a lot of us out there and there is hope that there just might be some free countries left when the dust settles on the nightmare from DC.</p>
<p>It will get a lot tougher if/when they take the uncontrolled Internet away from us, but for now you can see a lot of activity and more resistance to statism than you might have felt from your immediate surroundings and heard on your evening news.</p>
<p>Michael Boldin put it together in a great article at the <a href="http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=784">Campaign for Liberty</a>.  I found most of the list below linked in that article. Here&#8217;s his list and more&#8230; a heartening bunch for sure.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/nullification/10th-amendment-resolutions/">12 states have passed 10th amendment resolutions</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/nullification/real-id/">25 states passed laws and resolutions nullifying the Real ID act</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://firearmsfreedomact.com/">7 states have passed firearms freedom acts</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=000881">14 states have legalized medical marijuana</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/nullification/health-care/"> 28 states are dabbling with health care freedom</a>.</p>
<p>I could spend longer building this list, but suffice it to say, &#8220;The news is good&#8221;.  Follow a few of the links I included. Read more about limiting the federal government to its charter. Get involved in protecting your liberty NOW while it can be done nonviolently.  </p>
<p>Help launch the lifeboats.  They are a dang sight more comfortable than bobbing in the frigid water all alone wearing a life jacket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://idaholiberty.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=317</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s good side</title>
		<link>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=312</link>
		<comments>http://idaholiberty.com/?p=312#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idaholiberty.com/?p=312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama may well be the best thing that has happened to this country in 100 years. Lemme explain. But first, the latest outrage from Washington DC. You just spent $179,000,000 in foreign aid to Haiti, but are the only country involved who is hiding their flag. This is a very important fact &#8211; and you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama may well be the best thing that has happened to this country in 100 years. Lemme explain. But first, the latest outrage from Washington DC. </p>
<p>You just spent $179,000,000 in foreign aid to Haiti, but are the only country involved who is hiding their flag.  This is a <strong>very important fact</strong> &#8211; and you probably know by now that I&#8217;m not your regular fan-in-the-stands flag waver.</p>
<p><img src='http://idaholiberty.com/wp-content/gallery/pictures/hope-n-change.jpg' alt='hope-n-change' class='ngg-singlepic ngg-none' /></p>
<p><span id="more-312"></span></p>
<p>Obama is a speaker, a tool, an actor and a puppet for the same people who installed and controlled Bush II, Clinton, Bush I, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, etc.  And the way they installed Johnson has bothered me quite a bit too.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t stop reading quite yet. I know we &#8220;got a choice&#8221;, but the way it works was never made more clear than in the last election. </p>
<p>Ron Paul had a lead; a strong showing and it was a grass-roots, across-the-spectrum, out-of-nowhere fright for the guys who normally are on the top. The media (now remember that 5 guys control the media) went to full-bore ignore and discredit on Ron Paul. Still he was beating Guiliani and Romney in spite of their efforts. We came THAT close to having a choice.</p>
<p>Never leaving anything to chance, they dropped their first two choices and out of nowhere came McCain and Palin. From no money in their campaign treasuries to more than anybody in a blink. Lovely media coverage. Just about everything you could want in a couple of losers.  (Well they did, didn&#8217;t they?)  </p>
<p>So no matter what, we get a choice between a handful of their people, their puppets, that they offer us.</p>
<p>So THEY offered us a choice between their woman Hillary, and their men Obama, Guiliani, Romney and McCain.  We selected one of their offerings and felt somehow we were in charge.  The Media and The Money. The same handful of people hold the strings. They don&#8217;t much care which face we install on the marionette.</p>
<p>I want you to read the following quotes.<br />
One by one.<br />
<strong>Think about who said them</strong>.<br />
This New World Order thing explains a whole lot of inexplicable stuff &#8211; if you let it.  By the way, the last one is perhaps the most important.<br />
 <img src='http://idaholiberty.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Oh yeah, before you go &#8230; Why do I like Obama?  Because he pisses so many people off.  I think <em><strong>Those Who Can&#8217;t Be Named</strong></em> overestimated the success of their indoctrination. I think, gosh I HOPE they are pulling the trigger on their master plan before the critical mass is ready to accept the chains of servitude.</p>
<p>&#8212;-</p>
<p><em>	“The American people should be made aware of the trend toward monopolization of the great public information vehicles and the concentration of more and more power over public opinion in fewer and fewer hands.”<br />
– Spiro Agnew &#8211; U. S. Vice-President 1969</p>
<p>“Historically, much of the motivation for public schooling has been to stifle variety and institute social control.”<br />
– Jack Hugh &#8211; Cato Institute</p>
<p>&#8220;Those who formally rule take their signals and commands not from the electorate as a body, but from a small group of men (plus a few women). This group will be called the Establishment. It exists even though that existence is stoutly denied. It is one of the secrets of the American social order. … A second secret is the fact that the existence of the Establishment—the ruling class—is not supposed to be discussed.&#8221;<br />
– Arthur S. Miller &#8211; George Washington University Professor of Law</p>
<p>&#8220;A careful examination of what is happening behind the scenes reveals that all of these interests are working in concert with the masters of the Kremlin in order to create what some refer to as a “New World Order.” Private organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Trilateral Commission, the Dartmouth Conference, the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, the Atlantic Institute, and the Bilderberg Group serve to disseminate and to coordinate the plans for this so-called new world order in powerful business, financial, academic, and official circles.&#8221;<br />
– Jesse Helms &#8211; Source: speech to the Senate, 1987</p>
<p>&#8220;Of course, members of the dynastic banking families had been financing the Russian-oriented revolutionists for many years. Trotsky, in his biography, refers to some of these loans from British financiers going back as far as 1907. By 1917 the major subsidies for the revolution were being arranged by Sir George Buchanan and Lord Alfred Milner (of the Morgan-Rothschild-Rhodes confederacy). Milner, it will be recalled, was the founder of England’s secret “Round Table” group which started the Royal Institute for International Affairs in England and the Council on Foreign Relations in the United States. One American source gave Trotsky, Lenin and the other Communist leaders around twenty million dollars for the final triumph of Bolshevism in Russia. This was Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb and Company.&#8221;<br />
– W. Cleon Skousen &#8211; Source: The Naked Capitalist (Salt Lake City, 1970), pp. 40–41</p>
<p>“The invisible Money Power is working to control and enslave mankind. It financed Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Zionism and Socialism. All of these are directed to making the United States a member of World Government.&#8221;<br />
– American Mercury Magazine, December 1957, pg. 92</p>
<p>&#8220;The ultimate aim of the Council on Foreign Relations … is … to create a one-world socialist system and make the United States an official part of it.”<br />
– Dan Smoot<br />
[Howard Drummond Smoot] (1913-2003) former supervising member of the FBI headquarters staff in the Washington Office and one of the first to research and publish on the activities of the Council on Foreign Relations &#8211; Source: The Dan Smoot Report (20 July 1964)</p>
<p>&#8220;The interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the CFR, The Trilateral Commission — founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller — and the Bilderberger Group, have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next five years. They are not fighting against terrorists. They are fighting against citizens.”<br />
– Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl, PhD<br />
former German defense ministry official and advisor to former NATO Secretary General Manfred Werne &#8211; Source: November 6, 2001, interview with Michael C. Rupert, From The Wilderness Publications, 2001</p>
<p>&#8220;You know, by the time you become the leader of a country, someone else makes all the decisions. … You may find you can get away with virtual presidents, virtual prime ministers, virtual everything.”<br />
– Bill Clinton<br />
[William Jefferson Blythe III] (1946- ), 42nd US President &#8211; Source: 9/5/98, Dublin, Ireland</p>
<p>&#8220;The powers of financial capitalism had (a) far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank…sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.&#8221;<br />
– Carroll Quigley<br />
(1910-1977) Professor of History at Georgetown University, member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), mentor to Bill Clinton – Source: in his book Tragedy and Hope, 1966</p>
<p>&#8220;After the insiders have established the United Socialist States of America (in fact if not in name), the next step is the Great Merger of all nations of the world into a dictatorial world government. … The Insiders’ code word for the world superstate is “new world order,” a phrase often used by Richard Nixon. The Council on Foreign Relations states in its Study No. 7: “The U.S. must strive to: A. BUILD A NEW INTERNATIONAL ORDER.” … A world government has always been the object of the Communists.&#8221;<br />
– Gary Allen<br />
Source: None Dare Call It Conspiracy, p. 121</p>
<p>&#8220;It cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change its perceptions.&#8221;<br />
– Henry Kissinger<br />
(1923- ) Former US Secretary of State &#8211; Source: World Affairs Council Press Conference, Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel, 19 April 1994</p>
<p>&#8220;The major function of secrecy in Washington is to keep the U.S. people … from knowing what the nation’s leaders are doing.&#8221;<br />
– John Stockwell<br />
U.S. Marine Corps Major, and Chief of Station and National Security Council coordinator for the CIA</p>
<p>&#8220;The sovereignty fetish is still so strong in the public mind, that there would appear to be little chance of winning popular assent to American membership in anything approaching a super-state organization. Much will depend on the kind of approach which is used in further popular education.&#8221;<br />
– Council on Foreign Relations<br />
Source: “American Public Opinion and Postwar Security Commitments”, 1944</p>
<p>&#8220;Most people prefer to believe their leaders are just and fair even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one’s self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all.&#8221;<br />
Michael Rivero</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://idaholiberty.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=312</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
